As Canada observes National Housing Day 2024, a day dedicated to awareness about housing and homelessness, the stark reality is that housing insecurity is worsening across the nation. From federal missteps to municipal initiatives that barely scratch the surface, the efforts to combat the housing crisis tell a story of promises made, promises broken, and a growing gulf between intention and impact.
For millions of Canadians, housing insecurity has reached unprecedented levels. Recent reports show that 84% of Canadians now view homeownership as a luxury rather than a necessity, while 88% of renters believe they will never be able to afford a home. Cities like Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal have seen skyrocketing rents that put even modest apartments out of reach for many. In Vancouver, the average cost of a one-bedroom apartment now exceeds $2,000 per month, placing immense strain on low-income families and individuals.
This crisis is not confined to urban centres. Rural and suburban communities, once affordable refuges for the working class, have seen housing costs spiral upwards as demand outpaces supply. The ripple effects are felt across the socioeconomic spectrum, with middle-income earners squeezed out of homeownership and vulnerable populations pushed further into poverty. As governments across Canada grapple with this growing emergency, their successes and failures underscore the complexity of the housing issue—and the human cost of getting it wrong.
The federal government struggles to deliver on its National Housing Strategy
When the National Housing Strategy (NHS) launched in 2017, it was heralded as a groundbreaking $115 billion plan to tackle housing insecurity and reduce homelessness by 50% within a decade. Designed as a ten-year blueprint, the NHS sought to deliver affordable housing through a mix of federal investment, provincial partnerships, and private sector involvement. Yet, as its seventh anniversary approaches, the strategy has fallen far short of expectations.
One of the NHS’s most glaring shortcomings is its failure to serve Canada’s most vulnerable populations. Only 3% of units funded by the NHS are affordable for low-income households—a critical oversight in a nation grappling with widening economic inequality. The reliance on private developers to deliver affordable units has led to skewed outcomes, with funding prioritizing middle-class homeownership over the creation of deeply affordable rental housing. Federal Housing Advocate Marie Josee Houle has called the approach “inadequate,” pointing to the NHS’s inability to meet its own benchmarks on affordability and accessibility.
The homelessness crisis underscores the NHS’s ineffectiveness. Instead of reducing homelessness, rates have climbed by 20% nationally, with over 4,000 homeless individuals in Vancouver alone. Recent federal initiatives, such as the $574 million allocated for rental homes in Vancouver, have drawn criticism for failing to target those most at risk. For example, 80% of these units are designated for households earning over $87,000 annually, leaving little relief for those earning below $60,000. These figures illustrate a troubling disconnect between federal policy and the lived realities of Canada’s most marginalized communities.
British Columbia pushes bold policies but faces significant challenges
British Columbia has emerged as a leader in experimenting with housing solutions. Under Premier David Eby, the province launched the BC Builds initiative in early 2024, aiming to accelerate affordable housing construction through partnerships with non-profits, First Nations, and local governments. With $2 billion in low-cost financing and $950 million in grants allocated, the program promises to deliver thousands of new affordable units.
BC Builds has been praised for its innovative approach. By identifying 20 development sites and leveraging provincial resources, the initiative seeks to address housing shortages at an unprecedented scale. Premier Eby has also proposed streamlining approval processes, aiming to reduce the red tape that often delays housing projects. However, bureaucratic hurdles and the enormity of the housing deficit pose significant challenges. With over 6,500 single-room occupancy (SRO) units in Vancouver alone needing replacement, the province’s efforts, while commendable, fall short of meeting immediate needs.
The province’s focus on collaboration has also drawn national attention. Federal Housing Minister Sean Fraser has praised BC Builds as a potential model for a nationwide initiative tentatively titled Canada Builds. However, the success of such programs depends on the ability to turn policy into action. For BC, the stakes couldn’t be higher; the province’s daring ambitions must translate into tangible results for the thousands of residents struggling to find secure housing.
Vancouver battles its housing crisis with zoning reforms and slow progress
As one of Canada’s most expensive housing markets, Vancouver has become the epicentre of the nation’s housing crisis. The city’s average rent for a one-bedroom apartment now exceeds $2,000 per month, and homeownership remains out of reach for most middle-income families. With 4,000 homeless individuals and thousands more teetering on the edge of eviction, Vancouver’s housing challenges demand urgent action.
In response, the city has launched initiatives such as the Vancouver Social Housing Initiative, which aims to streamline zoning and fast-track the development of social and supportive housing. This program targets households earning below Provincial Housing Income Limits (HILs), offering a glimmer of hope for those struggling to keep up with skyrocketing costs. The initiative also removes rezoning requirements for certain projects, reducing delays that often plague affordable housing developments.
Despite these efforts, critics argue that the city’s approach remains insufficient. While zoning reforms and new developments address long-term needs, they do little to alleviate the immediate crisis faced by low-income and homeless residents. For many, the pace of change feels excruciatingly slow, leaving the most vulnerable populations without adequate support.
The Downtown Eastside reveals the harshest realities of housing insecurity
Nowhere is Vancouver’s housing crisis more visible than in the Downtown Eastside (DTES), a neighbourhood long defined by poverty, addiction, and homelessness. The DTES’s housing stock, primarily comprised of aging single-room occupancy (SRO) units, has become a symbol of the city’s failure to provide secure and dignified housing. With many SROs lacking basic amenities like private bathrooms or kitchens, residents often endure unsafe and unsanitary conditions.
The situation in the DTES has only worsened as homelessness rises. Tent encampments have become a common sight, reflecting the lack of affordable alternatives for those displaced from SROs or priced out of the rental market. A recent count identified over 4,000 homeless individuals in Vancouver, many of whom are concentrated in the DTES. This intersection of housing instability, addiction, and mental health challenges has overwhelmed the neighbourhood’s already fragile social services.
While the city has made efforts to address these issues, such as creating supportive housing units and expanding harm-reduction programs, progress has been slow. For residents of the DTES, the gap between policy and implementation often feels insurmountable. Without a comprehensive and immediate response, the neighbourhood risks becoming a permanent symbol of Canada’s housing failures.
The Decline of Single-Room Occupancies and Its Implications
Single-room occupancies have historically been a critical safety net for low-income residents in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, often serving as the last resort before homelessness. However, the 2023 Low-Income Housing Survey reveals an alarming trend: the rapid disappearance of SRO rooms at a rate that threatens to upend the housing landscape for the city’s most vulnerable populations. Over the past four years, the number of SRO rooms in Vancouver’s Downtown Core has fallen by 23%, dropping from 4,055 in 2019 to just 3,305 in 2023. This sharp decline is attributed to multiple factors, including fires, unsafe building conditions leading to city-mandated closures, and redevelopment projects converting these aging structures into more expensive market-rate housing. As these units vanish, thousands of residents are left scrambling to find alternatives in a market where even the most basic housing is increasingly out of reach.
Affordability within the remaining private SRO stock has become another pressing concern. The survey highlights that the average rent for a private SRO room in Vancouver’s Downtown Core rose from $561 in 2019 to $681 in 2023, a staggering 21% increase over just three years. For residents relying on income assistance or disability benefits—most of whom can only afford $375 per month for housing—these rent hikes have pushed many into precarious living situations. By 2023, only 52 privately owned SRO rooms in the city rented at the shelter component of income assistance, a dramatic decline from 1,700 in 2003. This collapse in affordability leaves an increasing number of tenants spending over half their income on rent, a critical threshold that heightens the risk of housing instability and homelessness. Furthermore, buildings that have changed ownership in recent years have experienced the most dramatic rent increases, with new investors performing minor renovations to justify higher rates without triggering the city’s Single Room Accommodation (SRA) by-law restrictions.
Efforts by governments and non-profit organizations to stabilize the SRO market have yielded some positive results, but these measures remain insufficient against the scale of the crisis. Public and non-profit ownership of SROs has grown to nearly 50% of the total stock, up from 48% in 2019. This shift has helped maintain affordability and improve living conditions in some buildings, but it also underscores the extent to which the private market has failed to provide sustainable housing for low-income residents. High-profile interventions, such as the expropriation of the Regent and Balmoral hotels on East Hastings Street, represent significant victories. Both buildings, previously infamous for their neglect and unsafe conditions, are now slated for redevelopment into social housing in partnership with BC Housing. While these redevelopments are a step forward, the pace of such initiatives has been slow, and they address only a fraction of the need. For the thousands of residents still dependent on privately owned SROs, rising rents, unsafe conditions, and displacement remain daily challenges, underscoring the urgent need for more comprehensive and immediate action.
A path forward demands systemic change in Canada
Canada’s housing crisis is not a singular issue, nor is it the result of isolated failures. It is a multi-layered problem, shaped by decades of systemic neglect, policy missteps, and market dynamics that have favoured profit over people. As National Housing Day 2024 sheds light on the nation’s ongoing struggles, it becomes evident that housing insecurity has escalated from a social challenge to a full-scale humanitarian crisis. Federal, provincial, and municipal initiatives reveal a patchwork of efforts that, while ambitious in rhetoric, often falter in execution. This fragmented approach has left vulnerable populations without the support they need while failing to address the broader affordability crisis gripping the country.
At the federal level, bold strategies like the National Housing Strategy promised transformative change but have instead underscored the limitations of market-reliant solutions. Ambitions to reduce homelessness and expand affordable housing have largely bypassed those most in need, exposing deep flaws in how affordability is defined and pursued. Meanwhile, provincial and municipal efforts, such as British Columbia’s BC Builds initiative and Vancouver’s social housing reforms, showcase innovative thinking but remain constrained by bureaucratic delays, insufficient funding, and an overwhelming demand that outpaces supply. These gaps are most visible in areas like Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, where housing, health, and social issues converge to reveal the human toll of a broken system.
The housing crisis highlights a profound disconnect between policy and lived reality, one that cannot be addressed through incremental reforms or isolated programs. It is a crisis that exposes the fragility of Canada’s approach to housing as a commodity rather than a public good. The loss of deeply affordable options, the rise of speculative development, and the increasing burden placed on non-profits and local governments underscore the need for systemic change. If housing remains treated as a privilege instead of a right, the crisis will deepen, further entrenching inequality and displacing communities. National Housing Day serves as a moment of reflection, but it also demands critical examination of the paths not taken and the urgent need for a unified, comprehensive approach.
Denise is a long-time advocate for affordable and dignified housing in the Downtown Eastside. Having lived in SROs and volunteered in homeless shelters, she brings a personal understanding of the housing crisis and its impact on the community. Her work reflects years of lived experience, frontline work, and commitment to creating better living conditions for DTES residents.
Leave a Comment